In the Matter of the Marriage of Alma Hernandez and Jody McCreary and In the Interest of L. M., a child Appeal from 321st District Court of Smith County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 12-18-00063-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF ALMA HERNANDEZ AND JODY MCCREARY AND IN THE INTEREST OF L.M., A CHILD § APPEAL FROM THE 321ST § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). On March 21, 2018, the clerk of this Court notified Appellant, Jody McCreary, that the filing fee in this appeal is due. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5. Appellant was informed that failure to remit the filing fee on or before April 2, 2018, would result in the Court’s taking appropriate action, including dismissal of the case without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). The date for remitting the filing fee has passed, and Appellant has not complied with the Court’s request or otherwise responded to our March 21 notice. Because Appellant has failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 5, the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). Opinion delivered April 11, 2018. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J. (PUBLISH) COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS JUDGMENT APRIL 11, 2018 NO. 12-18-00063-CV IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF ALMA HERNANDEZ AND JODY MCCREARY AND IN THE INTEREST OF L.M., A CHILD Appeal from the 321st District Court of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 17-1505-D) THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.