Ex Parte: David Mark Davis, II Appeal from County Court at Law No 2 of Angelina County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 12-16-00287-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS § APPEAL FROM THE § COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 § ANGELINA COUNTY, TEXAS EX PARTE: DAVID MARK DAVIS, II MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM David Mark Davis, II attempts to appeal the trial court’s denial of his application for writ of habeas corpus. On October 28, 2016, this Court notified Appellant that the information received in this appeal does not show the jurisdiction of this Court, i.e., there is no timely notice of appeal or timely motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2, 26.3, 37.2. Appellant was further notified that the appeal would be dismissed unless the information was amended on or before November 7, 2016, to show the jurisdiction of this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.3. This deadline has now passed, and Appellant has neither shown the jurisdiction of this court nor otherwise responded to its October 28, 2016 notice. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f), 44.3. Opinion delivered November 16, 2016. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J. (DO NOT PUBLISH) COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS JUDGMENT NOVEMBER 16, 2016 NO. 12-16-00287-CR EX PARTE: DAVID MARK DAVIS, II Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 of Angelina County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 14-1048-2) THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the appellate record, and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that it is without jurisdiction of the appeal, and that the appeal should be dismissed. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.