In Re: Timothy G. Ivers II Appeal from County Court at Law No 2 of Smith County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 12-16-00249-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS IN RE: § TIMOTHY G. IVERS II, § RELATOR § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Relator Timothy G. Ivers II seeks mandamus relief from the trial court’s order denying his motion to transfer venue in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship. After considering the relator’s petition for writ of mandamus, the Court is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, the relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a), (d). Opinion delivered September 21, 2016. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J. (PUBLISH) COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS JUDGMENT SEPTEMBER 21, 2016 NO. 12-16-00249-CV TIMOTHY G. IVERS II, Relator V. HON. RANDALL L. ROGERS, Respondent Appeal from the County Court at Law No 2 of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.) ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by TIMOTHY G. IVERS II, who is the relator in Cause No. 10-1166-F, pending on the docket of the County Court at Law #2 of Smith County, Texas. Said petition for writ of mandamus having been filed herein on September 9, 2016, and the same having been duly considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that a writ of mandamus should not issue, it is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus be, and the same is, hereby DENIED. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.