Willie D. Beasley v. The State of Texas Appeal from 173rd District Court of Henderson County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 12-16-00158-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS WILLIE D. BEASLEY, APPELLANT § APPEAL FROM THE 173RD V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § HENDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Appellant attempts to appeal from an order denying his motion for appointment of counsel to assist him with his habeas corpus proceedings. As a general rule, an appeal in a criminal case may be taken only from a judgment of conviction. See Workman v. State, 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (Tex. Crim. App. 1961). However, there are certain narrow exceptions. Wright v. State, 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1998, no pet.) (listing exceptions). The order Appellant complains of is not a judgment of conviction nor does it fall within any exception to the general rule. Therefore, this Court does not have jurisdiction over the appeal. On May 31, 2016, this Court notified Appellant that the information received in this appeal does not include a final judgment or other appealable order and therefore does not show the jurisdiction of this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.2. Appellant was further notified that the appeal would be dismissed unless the information was amended, on or before June 10, 2016, to show the jurisdiction of this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.3. This deadline has now passed, and Appellant has neither shown the jurisdiction of this Court nor otherwise responded to its May 31, 2016 notice. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). Opinion delivered June 15, 2016. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J. (DO NOT PUBLISH) COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS JUDGMENT JUNE 15, 2016 NO. 12-16-00158-CR WILLIE D. BEASLEY, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Appeal from the 173rd District Court of Henderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. A-9192) THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this court is without jurisdiction of the appeal, and that the appeal should be dismissed. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
