Azleway Charter School and Azleway, Inc. v. Lacy Hogue Appeal from County Court at Law No 3 of Smith County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 12-15-00257-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS AZLEWAY CHARTER SCHOOL AND AZLEWAY, INC., APPELLANTS § APPEAL FROM THE V. § COUNTY COURT AT LAW #3 LACY HOGUE, APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM This appeal is being dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b). Appellant perfected its appeal on September 16, 2015, and its brief was due on November 30, 2015. When Appellant failed to file its brief by the due date, this court notified Appellant on December 1, 2015, that the brief was past due. The notice warned that if the brief was not received by December 11, 2015, the appeal would be presented for dismissal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c). To date, Appellant has neither complied with nor otherwise responded to this Court’s December 1, 2015 notice. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b). Opinion delivered December 16, 2015. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J. (PUBLISH) COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS JUDGMENT DECEMBER 16, 2015 NO. 12-15-00257-CV AZLEWAY CHARTER SCHOOL AND AZLEWAY, INC., Appellants V. LACY HOGUE, Appellee Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 64,330-B) THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this court is without jurisdiction of the appeal, and that the appeal should be dismissed. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of prosecution; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.