Sabre Energy Corporation, SonCo Holdings, LLC, Van W. Mounts and Edwin Wesley Sano v. Well-Pro Service, L.P. Appeal from County Court at Law No 2 of Gregg County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 12-15-00054-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS SABRE ENERGY CORPORATION, SONCO HOLDINGS, LLC, VAN W. MOUNTS AND EDWIN WESLEY SANO, APPELLANT § APPEAL FROM THE § COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 § GREGG COUNTY, TEXAS V. WELL-PRO SERVICE, L.P., APPELLEE MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM The parties have filed a joint motion to remand in which they state that they have settled all claims in issue in this appeal. Consequently, they request that the trial court’s judgment be reversed and that the cause be remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the agreement of the parties. This court is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Accordingly, we grant the joint motion to remand, reverse the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits, and remand this cause to the trial court for further proceedings in accordance with the parties’ agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B), 43.2(d). Pursuant to the parties’ agreement, costs are taxed against the party incurring them. Opinion delivered July 22, 2015. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J. (PUBLISH) COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS JUDGMENT JULY 22, 2015 NO. 12-15-00054-CV SABRE ENERGY CORPORATION, SONCO HOLDINGS, LLC, VAN W. MOUNTS AND EDWIN WESLEY SANO, Appellants V. WELL-PRO SERVICE, L.P., Appellee Appeal from the County Court at Law No 2 of Gregg County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 2012-1207-CCL2) THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and the briefs filed herein and the joint motion to remand for purposes of settlement, the Court having heard and fully consider said motion is of the opinion the same should be granted. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits be reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings in accordance with the parties’ agreement, and that all costs of this appeal are hereby adjudged against the party incurring same; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
