In Re: Amber Nicole Sullender--Appeal from 273rd District Court of San Augustine County (per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 12-12-00058-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS IN RE: § AMBER NICOLE SULLENDER, § RELATOR § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Relator Amber Nicole Sullender filed this original mandamus proceeding complaining of the trial court s February 2, 2012 order granting the real party in interest, Brenda Denise Turner, possession of and access to Amber s two sons. Turner is the children s grandmother. On July 11, 2012, this court issued an opinion and order conditionally granting mandamus relief. However, the opinion and order provided that the writ would not issue if the respondent vacated his February 2, 2012 temporary order granting Turner possession of and access to her grandchildren, and issued an order dismissing Brenda s original petition. On July 18, 2012, the respondent complied with this court s opinion and order. Therefore, all issues in this original proceeding have been disposed of and the proceeding is rendered moot. Accordingly, we dismiss Sullender s petition for writ of mandamus as moot. Opinion delivered July 25, 2012. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J. (PUBLISH) COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS JUDGMENT JULY 25, 2012 NO. 12-12-00058-CV AMBER NICOLE SULLENDER, Relator v. HON. CHARLES R. MITCHELL, Respondent ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by AMBER NICOLE SULLENDER, who is the relator in Cause No. CV-11-9324, pending on the docket of the 273rd Judicial District Court of San Augustine County, Texas. Said petition for writ of mandamus having been filed herein on February 3, 2012, and the same having been duly considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that this proceeding has been rendered moot, it is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus be, and the same is, hereby DISMISSED. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
