Efrain Contreras v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 241st District Court of Smith County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 12-10-00045-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS
EFRAIN CONTRERAS,
APPELLANT
'
APPEAL FROM THE 241ST
V.
'
JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
APPELLEE
'
SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
This appeal is being dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant was convicted
of aggravated sexual assault of a child. Thereafter, Appellant filed a notice of appeal.
To be sufficient to invoke the appellate court’s full jurisdiction, the notice of
appeal filed by an appellant in a criminal case must bear the trial court’s certification of
the appellant’s right to appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(a)(2). TEX.
R. APP. P. 25.2(d). The certification should be part of the record when notice is filed, but
may be added by timely amendment or supplementation. Id. Appellant’s notice of
appeal does not include the required certification.
On March 30, 2010, this court notified Appellant through his counsel, pursuant to
Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 25.2 and 37.1, that the notice of appeal does not
include the trial court certification. The notice also informed Appellant that the appeal
would be dismissed unless, on or before April 9, 2010, the clerk’s record was amended to
The deadline for responding to this court’s notice
include the required certification.
has expired, and the clerk’s record has not been amended to show Appellant’s right to
appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Opinion delivered April 28, 2010.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
(DO NOT PUBLISH)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
