In Re: Alex Melvin Wade, Jr.--Appeal from 3rd District Court of County

Annotate this Case
NO. 12-03-00286-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE: ALEX MELVIN WADE, JR.

 
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

RELATOR

 
MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Alex Melvin Wade, Jr. seeks a writ of mandamus requiring the judge of the Third Judicial District of Houston County, Texas to allow his petition for writ of mandamus to proceed "in accordance with due process of law." Specifically, Relator alleges that he filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the Third Judicial District Court requesting that the warden of the Eastham Unit be compelled to comply with an administrative directive. According to Relator, the judge "'[D]isallowed the Suit' thereby causing the same be [sic] rejected filing by the Clerk of Court." We deny the writ.

Relator's petition for writ of mandamus filed in this court does not meet the requirements of Rule 52.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Therefore, Relator has failed to furnish a record showing that he is entitled to the requested relief. Accordingly, Relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

DIANE DEVASTO

Justice

Opinion delivered September 10, 2003

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J. and DeVasto,J.

 
(PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JUDGMENT
SEPTEMBER 10, 2003
NO. 12-03-00286-CV
IN RE: ALEX MELVIN WADE, JR.,
Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by Alex Melvin Wade, Jr., who is the Relator in the underlying cause, pending on the docket of the Third Judicial District Court of Houston County, Texas. Said petition for writ of mandamus having been filed herein on September 2, 2003, and the same having been duly considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that a Writ of Mandamus should Not Issue, it is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus be, and the same is, hereby Denied.

Diane DeVasto, Justice.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and DeVasto, J.

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.