Keith Thomas v. Jeffery G. Mark, Mandi R. Williamson, Jonathan E. Heaton, Charles M. James and T.D.C.J.-I.D.--Appeal from 3rd District Court of County

Annotate this Case
MARY'S OPINION HEADING NO. 12-02-00334-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS

KEITH THOMAS,

APPEAL FROM THE THIRD

APPELLANT

 

V.

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

JEFFERY G. MARK, MANDI R.

WILLIAMSON, JONATHAN E. HEATON,

CHARLES M. JAMES AND T.D.C.J.-I.D.,

APPELLEES HOUSTON COUNTY, TEXAS

PER CURIAM

This pro se appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). The judgment in the instant case was signed on October 24, 2002. Thereafter, on October 30, 2002, Appellant filed a notice of appeal which failed to contain the information required by Rule 25.1(e), i.e., a certificate of service showing service on all parties to the trial court's judgment.

On November 15, 2002, Appellant was notified pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 37.1 that the notice of appeal was defective for failure to comply with Rule 25.1(e). He was further notified that unless he filed a corrected notice of appeal on or before December 16, 2002, the appeal would be referred to the court for further action. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

On December 2, 2002, Appellant filed an amended notice of appeal, which did not include a certificate of service as required by Rule 25.1(e). Since Appellant has failed to correct his defective notice of appeal after notice, the appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).

Opinion delivered December 18, in the Year of our Lord 2002.

Panel consisted of Gohmert, Jr., C.J., Worthen, J., and Griffith, J.

 
(DO NOT PUBLISH)