ROGELIO V. CASTELLANOS v. JOSE A. CASAS AND MARIA G. CASAS, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF THEIR DECEASED CHILD, JAVIER CASAS--Appeal from 93rd District Court of Hidalgo County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NUMBERS 13-11-00478-CV, 13-11-00508-CV, & 13-11-00509-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI EDINBURG ROGELIO V. CASTELLANOS, Appellant, v. JOSE A. CASAS AND MARIA G. CASAS, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF THEIR DECEASED CHILD, JAVIER CASAS, Appellees. On appeal from the 93rd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant, Rogelio V. Castellanos, has appealed three separate orders issued by the trial court in these three appellate causes. The parties have now filed an Agreed Motion to Dismiss the Appeal in each of these causes on grounds that the parties have reached an agreement to settle and compromise their differences. The parties request that this Court dismiss the appeals. The Court, having considered the documents on file and the Agreed Motion to Dismiss in each cause, is of the opinion that the motions should be and are GRANTED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). The stay previously imposed by the Court in these causes is LIFTED. The appeals are hereby DISMISSED. By agreement, each party will bear its own costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeals at the parties request, no motions for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandates will issue forthwith. IT IS SO ORDERED. PER CURIAM Delivered and filed the 31st day of August, 2011. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
