Delia Gorena v. Betressa Blackwell and Jessica Lynn Blackwell--Appeal from 36th District Court of San Patricio County

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NUMBER 13-08-00323-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ______________________________________________________________ DELIA GORENA, APPELLANT, v. BETRESSA BLACKWELL AND JESSICA LYNN BLACKMAN, APPELLEES. _____________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 36th District Court of San Patricio County, Texas. ______________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Yanez, Garza, and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant, Delia Gorena, perfected an appeal from a judgment rendered against her in favor of appellee, Betressa Blackwell and Jessica Lynn Blackman.1 On May 20, 2009, 1 On October 16, 2008, this Court issued a m em orandum opinion dism issing this appeal. See Gorena v. Blackwell, No. 13-08-00323-CV, 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 7893 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi Oct. 16, 2008, no pet.). On February 9, 2009, this Court issued an order granting appellant’s m otion for rehearing and withdrawing our previous opinion and judgm ent issued in this cause. The appeal rem ains pending before the Court. the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the clerk's record in the above cause was originally due on June 5, 2008, and that the deputy clerk, Ernestina Roblez, had notified this Court that appellant failed to make arrangements for payment of the clerk's record. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See TEX . R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. Appellant has failed to respond to this Court’s notice. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). PER CURIAM Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 2nd day of July, 2009. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.