FORTY-TWO THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED EIGHT DOLLARS ($42,508.00) IN US CURRENCY AND ONE (1) 1997 FORD ECONOLINE VAN, VIN #1FDEE14L1VHB91899 v. THE STATE OF TEXAS--Appeal from 105th District Court of Kleberg County

Annotate this Case
NUMBER 13-07-350-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_______________________________________________________

 

FORTY-TWO THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED EIGHT

DOLLARS ($42,508.00) IN U.S. CURRENCY AND

ONE (1) 1997 FORD ECONOLINE VAN, VIN

#FDEE14L1VHB91899, Appellant,

 
v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

_______________________________________________________

 
On appeal from the 105th District Court
of Kleberg County, Texas

_______________________________________________________

 
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Ya ez, Garza, and Benavides
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, JOSE LUIS GENARO RODRIGUEZ RODRIGUEZ, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 105th District Court of Kleberg County, Texas, in cause number 06-592-D. Judgment in this cause was signed on December 18, 2006. An untimely motion for new trial was filed on February 28, 2007. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellant's notice of appeal was due on January 17, 2007, but was not filed until February 28, 2007.

Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court's letter, the appeal would be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to timely perfect his appeal, and appellant's failure to respond to this Court's notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 23rd day of August, 2007.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.