SCOGGINS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. HECTOR G. LEAL AND SAN BENITO CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT--Appeal from 107th District Court of Cameron County

Annotate this Case
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

________________________________________________________

NUMBER 13-06-415-CV

SCOGGINS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Appellant,

 
v.

HECTOR G. LEAL AND SAN BENITO INDEPENDENT

SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellees.

_______________________________________________________

 
On appeal from the 107th District Court
of Cameron County, Texas.

________________________________________________________

NUMBER 13-06-492-CV

 
IN RE SCOGGINS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.

________________________________________________________

 
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

_________________________________________________________

 
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 

Scoggins Construction Company, Inc. sought review of the trial court's denial of its motion to compel arbitration through an interlocutory appeal and a petition for writ of mandamus. The parties have now filed joint motions to vacate and remand in accordance with agreement of the parties. In their motion, the parties request that this Court vacate the trial court's interlocutory order and remand this case for further proceedings in accordance with the agreement of the parties. The parties further requests that costs be taxed against the party incurring same.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motions to vacate and to remand in accordance with agreement of the parties, is of the opinion that the motions should be granted. The joint motions to vacate and to remand in accordance with agreement of the parties are GRANTED. The trial court's interlocutory order denying motion to compel arbitration is hereby VACATED, and the cause is REMANDED to the trial court in accordance with the agreement of the parties.

 

PER CURIAM

 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 22nd day of March, 2007.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.