In the Interest of X.A.T., A Child--Appeal from 146th District Court of Bell County

NUMBER 13-06-228-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN THE INTEREST OF X.A.T., A CHILD

On appeal from the 146th District Court of Bell County, Texas.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Ya ez, Benavides, and Vela
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Ya ez

This is an accelerated appeal from an order terminating the parental rights of appellant, Angelica Rivens, to her minor child, X.A.T. (1)

Appellant's attorney has filed an Anders brief, (2) informing this Court that she has thoroughly examined the record and can find no arguable grounds to be advanced on appeal. The procedures set forth in Anders are applicable to an appeal of the termination of parental rights when an appointed attorney concludes that there are no non-frivolous issues to assert on appeal. (3) The brief filed meets the requirements of Anders by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no arguable grounds for appeal. (4) Appellant's attorney states that she has served a copy of her brief on appellant and informed appellant of her right to file a pro se brief. More than thirty days have passed and no pro se brief has been filed.

Upon receiving an Anders brief, we must conduct a full examination of all the proceedings to determine whether the case is wholly frivolous. (5) We have reviewed the entire record and the briefs, and we have found nothing that would arguably support an appeal. (6) We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's decree terminating the parental rights of appellant.

In accordance with Anders, appellant's attorney has asked permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant. (7) We grant her motion to withdraw. We further order appellant's attorney to notify appellant of the disposition of this appeal and the availability of discretionary review. (8)

 

LINDA REYNA YA EZ,

Justice

 

Memorandum opinion delivered and filed

this the 8th day of March, 2007.

1. The trial court also terminated the parental rights of Anthony Kelly Crews to his minor child X.A.T. Crews is not a party to this appeal.

2. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967).

3. See In re K.D., 127 S.W.3d 66, 67 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, no pet.); Porter v. Tex. Dep't of Protective & Regulatory Servs., 105 S.W.3d 52, 56 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi 2003, no pet.).

4. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744.

5. Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988).

6. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

7. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744.

8. See In re K.D., 127 S.W.3d at 68 n.3 (citing Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25, 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997) (per curiam)).