GUADALUPE SALAZAR, JR. v. THE STATE OF TEXAS--Appeal from 214th District Court of Nueces County

Annotate this Case
/**/

NUMBER 13-04-178-CR

 

COURT OF APPEALS

 

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

 

GUADALUPE SALAZAR, JR., Appellant,

 

v.

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

______________________________________________________________

 

On appeal from the 214th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

Before Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Garza

Opinion Per Curiam

 

Appellant, GUADALUPE SALAZAR, JR., attempts to appeal a conviction for burglary of a habitation with intent to commit theft. The trial court has certified that this is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

On April 13, 2004, this Court notified appellant s counsel of the trial court s certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel s findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification.

On May 13, 2004, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel s response fails to establish either that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if the trial court s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); see Tex. R. App. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. Any pending motions are denied as moot.

 

PER CURIAM

 

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 3rd day of June, 2004.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.