Julian Ortega v. The State of Texas Appeal from 331st District Court of Travis County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-21-00115-CR Julian Ortega, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE 331ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-DC-21-200066, THE HONORABLE CHANTAL ELDRIDGE, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Julian Ortega, representing himself pro se, has filed a notice of “direct appeal,” in which he appears to challenge an emergency protective order signed by a magistrate on January 3, 2021, following his arrest for assault-family violence.1 See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 17.292. The standards for determining whether an appellate court has jurisdiction to hear and determine a case “is not whether the appeal is precluded by law, but whether the appeal is authorized by law.” Blanton v. State, 369 S.W.3d 894, 902 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012) (quoting Abbott v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 696-97 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008)). In Texas, appeals in criminal cases are permitted only when they are specifically authorized by statute. State ex. rel. Lykos v. Fine, 330 S.W.3d 904, 915 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011); see Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 44.02 (“A 1 By its terms, the emergency protective order expired on February 5, 2021. On March 2, 2021, Ortega was charged by indictment for the offense of assault family-violence. See Tex. Penal Code § 22.01(b)(2)(A). That charge currently remains pending. defendant in any criminal action has the right of appeal under the rules hereinafter prescribed . . . .”); Tex. R. App. P. 26.2 (notice of appeal must be filed “within 30 days after day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, or after the day the trial court enters an appealable order”). Although a defendant may appeal from a judgment of conviction for violation of an emergency protective order, see e.g., Smith v. State, No. 02-19-00035-CR, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 1066, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Feb. 6, 2020, pet. ref’d) (mem. op. not designated for publication), no statute authorizes an appeal from an emergency protective order. Consequently, we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and the appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f). __________________________________________ Chari L. Kelly, Justice Before Justices Goodwin, Triana, and Kelly Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: May 7, 2021 Do Not Publish 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
