Alvis Jackson III v. The State of Texas Appeal from 26th District Court of Williamson County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-19-00227-CR Alvis Jackson III, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE 26TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY NO. 16-0849-K26, THE HONORABLE DONNA GAYLE KING, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Alvis Jackson III has filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s dismissal of his charge of burglary.1 In criminal cases, unless expressly authorized by statute, appellate courts only have jurisdiction to review judgments of conviction. Abbott v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 696 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (“The standard for determining jurisdiction is not whether the appeal is precluded by law, but whether the appeal is authorized by law.”); Glaze v. State, 675 S.W.2d 768, 769-70 (Tex. Crim. App. 1984) (holding that neither court of appeals nor court of criminal appeals has jurisdiction to consider merits of case unless there is a conviction 1 On July 31, 2019, the Clerk of this Court notified Jackson’s court-appointed attorney that it appeared that the charge in this cause had been dismissed and requested that she file a response explaining how this Court could exercise jurisdiction over this appeal. In her written response, Jackson’s attorney agreed that this appeal should be dismissed and explained that she was unaware of the dismissal in this cause at the time she filed the notice of appeal. According to Jackson’s attorney, this cause was dismissed as a result of a Jackson’s conviction in another matter, trial court cause number 16-0850-K26, an appeal of which is currently pending in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals, appellate cause number 14-19-00365-CR. from which to appeal); see Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 44.02 (“A defendant in any criminal action has the right of appeal under the rules prescribed . . . .”). The order that is the subject of this appeal is not a judgment of conviction, and there is no statute authorizing this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. __________________________________________ Chari L. Kelly, Justice Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Kelly Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: August 23, 2019 Do Not Publish 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
