Laurie Granado v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 390th District Court of Travis County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-04-00423-CR Laurie Granado, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 390TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 9034150, HONORABLE JULIE H. KOCUREK, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION In October 2003, appellant Laurie Granado was convicted of arson, sentenced to four years in prison, and placed on community supervision for four years. Three-and-a-half months later, the State moved to revoke. Following a hearing, the court granted the motion and imposed sentence, which it reduced to three years imprisonment. We affirm. In three points of error, appellant contends the court abused its discretion by revoking her supervision because the State failed to prove that she committed a subsequent criminal offense as alleged in the motion to revoke. Appellant does not challenge, however, the court s findings that she was delinquent in paying ordered fees, costs, and restitution, and that she had failed to perform required community service. A finding of a single violation of the conditions of supervision is sufficient to support revocation. Sanchez v. State, 603 S.W.2d 869, 871 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980). Thus, in order to prevail, an appellant must successfully challenge all the findings that support the revocation order. Jones v. State, 571 S.W.2d 191, 193-94 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Joseph v. State, 3 S.W.3d 627, 640 (Tex. App. Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, no pet.). Because the district court s unchallenged findings are sufficient to support its order, we need not address appellant s points of error. The order revoking community supervision is affirmed. __________________________________________ Jan P. Patterson, Justice Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Patterson and Puryear Affirmed Filed: August 24, 2005 Do Not Publish 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
