In the Matter of J. A. M.--Appeal from 98th District Court of Travis County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-04-00598-CV
In the Matter of J. A. M.
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. J-22,866, HONORABLE W. JEANNE MEURER, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
In April 2004, J. A. M. filed his notice of appeal from the trial court’s February 2004
order adjudicating him delinquent and placing him on probation. In May, appellant’s trial counsel
withdrew from the case and a new attorney was appointed to represent him. The clerk’s record was
filed in September and the reporter’s record was filed in December. In January 2005, this Court
notified appellant that his brief was overdue. In February, appellate counsel responded that appellant
had absconded after being placed on probation and that, after a hearing, the trial court “ruled that due
to [appellant’s] absconder status, he was not entitled to a court appointed attorney.” Counsel said
that at the hearing, she “was withdrawn from the case.” Appellate counsel also stated that she had
not heard from appellant or his family since. In March, a trial court clerk informed this Court that
appellant had been rearrested for probation violations in mid-February and that a hearing was set for
March 23. In May, this Court again contacted appellate counsel, asking if appellant intended to
pursue the appeal. Counsel responded, informing this Court that appellant had an upcoming court
date in late June and was being represented by the Juvenile Public Defender’s Office. Counsel
suggested that dismissal of this appeal might be appropriate.
It appears that the order from which this notice of appeal was filed is a final and
appealable order. However, it is unclear whether appellant wishes to continue this appeal, whether
he understands that an appeal from the February 2004 appeal is pending, and whether he is still
represented by counsel in this appeal or only in the proceeding ongoing in the trial court. On our
own motion, we abate this appeal and remand it to the trial court for a status report as to whether
appellant wishes to pursue this appeal and, if so, whether counsel has been or should be appointed
to pursue this appeal. The trial court is requested to respond to this Court by August 26, 2005.
__________________________________________
David Puryear, Justice
Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear
Filed: July 26, 2005
2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
