John Robert Jimenez v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 27th District Court of Bell County

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-01-00469-CR NO. 03-01-00470-CR NO. 03-01-00471-CR John Robert Jimenez, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NOS. 52,011, 52,012 & 52,013, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING Appellant John Robert Jimenez pleaded guilty to one count of aggravated sexual assault and one count of indecency with a child in both Bell County cause number 52,011 and cause number 52,012. He pleaded guilty to two counts of indecency with a child in cause number 52, 013. The district court sentenced appellant to imprisonment for life for each count of aggravated sexual assault, and to imprisonment for twenty years for each count of indecency with a child. Appellant s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeals are frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the records demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). A copy of counsel s brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised of his right to examine the appellate records and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed. We have reviewed the records and counsel s brief and agree that the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the records that might arguably support the appeals. Counsel s motion to withdraw is granted. The judgments of conviction are affirmed. __________________________________________ Marilyn Aboussie, Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear Affirmed Filed: November 8, 2001 Do Not Publish 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.