Bonnie Vinetta White v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 264th District Court of Bell County

Annotate this Case
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-97-00244-CR
Bonnie Vinetta White, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 45,657, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING
PER CURIAM

Appellant pleaded guilty to an indictment accusing her of possessing less than one gram of cocaine. Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. 481.115 (West Supp. 1997). The district court adjudged her guilty and assessed punishment at incarceration in a state jail for two years. The court suspended imposition of sentence and placed appellant on community supervision. Later, on the State's motion, the court revoked supervision and imposed sentence.

Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by advancing contentions which counsel says might arguably support the appeal. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised of her right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The district court's failure to admonish appellant as required by article 26.13(a)(4), if properly before us on this appeal, was harmless for the reason stated in Matchett v. State, 941 S.W.2d 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 26.13(a)(4) (West 1989). The error committed by trial counsel discussed in the brief does not rise to the level of ineffective assistance.

The order revoking community supervision is affirmed.

 

Before Justices Powers, Aboussie and B. A. Smith

Affirmed

Filed: September 11, 1997

Do Not Publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.