Jose Alfredo Delira v. The State of Texas--Appeal from County Court of Freestone County

Annotate this Case

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

 

No. 10-08-00007-CR

Jose Alfredo Delira,

Appellant

v.

The State of Texas,

Appellee

 

 

From the County Court

Freestone County, Texas

Trial Court No. 21633

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

The State has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution because of the appellant s failure to request preparation of the clerk s record and his failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk s fee for preparation of the record. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). The State s motion is supported by the affidavit of the trial court clerk. The appellant has not responded to the State s motion.

Rule of Appellate Procedure 37.3(b) provides:

If the trial court clerk failed to file the clerk s record because the appellant failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk s fee for preparing the clerk s record, the appellate court may on a party s motion or its own initiative dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. The court must give the appellant a reasonable opportunity to cure before dismissal.

Id.

Here, the State s motion has placed appellant on notice of the need to request preparation of the clerk s record and pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk s fee for its preparation. Appellant is represented by retained counsel and has not taken any of the necessary steps to proceed without payment of costs. See id. 20.2. Because the motion has been pending for more than ten days, appellant has had a reasonable opportunity to cure, but he has failed to do so. Id. 37.3(b). Accordingly, the State s motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Id.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Vance, and

Justice Reyna

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed April 23, 2008

Do not publish

[CR25]

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.