Ryan Everett v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 54th District Court of McLennan County

Annotate this Case

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

 

No. 10-02-216-CR

 

RYAN EVERETT,

Appellant

v.

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

 

From the 54th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court # 1996-848-C

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The trial court revoked Ryan Everett s community supervision for sexual assault in June 2000. Everett filed a motion for a free copy of the trial record in May 2002. The trial court denied the motion, and Everett appealed.

Article V, section 6 of the Texas Constitution invests this Court with jurisdiction over all cases of which the District Courts or County Courts have original or appellate jurisdiction, under such restrictions and regulations as may be prescribed by law. Tex. Const. art. V, 6. Article 44.02 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides in pertinent part, A defendant in any criminal action has the right of appeal. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.02 (Vernon 1979). Texas courts have consistently construed article 44.02 to allow an appeal only from a final judgment [of conviction], though the statute does not contain this limitation on its face. Benford v. State, 994 S.W.2d 404, 408-09 (Tex. App. Waco 1999, no pet.) (quoting State v. Sellers, 790 S.W.2d 316, 321 n.4 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990)). This Court has jurisdiction over other types of criminal appeals only when expressly granted by law. Benford, 994 S.W.2d at 409 (quoting Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991)).

A defendant in a criminal case should perfect a separate appeal when a trial court denies his request for a free appellate record. See Nelson v. State, 6 S.W.3d 722, 726 (Tex. App. Waco 1999, order, no pet.). However, no statute vests this Court with jurisdiction over an appeal from an order denying a request for a free copy of the trial record when such a request is not presented in conjunction with a timely-filed appeal. Cf. Turner v. State, 71 S.W.3d 928, 929-30 (Tex. App. Waco 2002, order) (applying Rule of Appellate Procedure 2 to allow late-filed motion for free appellate record where notice of appeal timely filed). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. //

PER CURIAM

 

Before Chief Justice Davis,

Justice Vance, and

Justice Gray

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed October 23, 2002

Publish

[CR25]

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.