Michael Andrew Holland v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 13th District Court of Navarro County

Annotate this Case
Holland-MA v. State /**/

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

 

No. 10-96-109-CR

 

MICHAEL ANDREW HOLLAND,

Appellant

v.

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

 

From the 13th District Court

Navarro County, Texas

Trial Court # 26,076-CR

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

Michael Holland pleaded guilty to burglary of a habitation and the court assessed the agreed punishment of ten years' incarceration. Tex. Penal Code Ann. 30.02 (Vernon 1994 & Supp. 1996). Because Holland failed to timely file a notice of appeal, we dismiss his appeal for want of jurisdiction. Tex. R. App. P. 41(b)(1); Rodarte v. State, 860 S.W.2d 108, 109-10 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993).

To appeal from his conviction and punishment, Holland must have filed a notice of appeal within thirty days "after the day sentence [was] imposed or suspended in open court" or within ninety days if a timely motion for new trial is filed. Tex. R. App. P. 41(b)(1). According to the judgment in the transcript, his sentence was imposed on January 26, 1996. He filed his notice of appeal on April 24, the eighty-ninth day after sentencing. There is no indication in the transcript that he filed a motion for a new trial. Thus, his notice was fifty-nine days late. Id.; Rodarte, 860 S.W.2d at 109-10. He did not file a motion for an extension of time to file the notice of appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 41(b)(2); Olivo v. State, No. 442-95, slip op. at 4, 1996 WL 135625 *2-3 (Tex. Crim. App. March 27, 1996). Because he did not file a timely motion for a new trial and his notice of appeal was not filed within thirty days of sentencing, we do not have jurisdiction over his appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 41(b)(1); Rodarte, 860 S.W.2d at 109-10.

We notified Holland of this jurisdictional defect by letter on May 30 sent to the address he listed on the notice of appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 83. He has not responded to our notice.

Thus, we dismiss this cause for want of jurisdiction. Id. 41(b)(1); Rodarte, 860 S.W.2d at 109-10.

PER CURIAM

 

Before Chief Justice Davis,

Justice Cummings, and

Justice Vance

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction

Opinion delivered and filed June 26, 1996

Do not publish