James Curtis Sheppard v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 195th District Court of Dallas County

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-94-113-CR

No. 10-94-114-CR

No. 10-94-115-CR

No. 10-94-116-CR

No. 10-94-117-CR

No. 10-94-118-CR

JAMES CURTIS SHEPPARD,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 195th District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court # F93-69020-TLN, F93-45230-SN,

F93-69022-TLN, F93-69021-TLN,

F93-38974-TLN and F93-45190-QTN

MEMORANDUM OPINION

James Sheppard's appointed attorney filed an Anders brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). On November 30, 1994, we granted the attorney's motion to withdraw in a per curiam order, finding that the appeal was without merit. See Johnson v. State, 885 S.W.2d 641 (Tex. App. Waco 1994) (discussing procedures for Anders appeals). Sheppard has not filed a pro-se brief or any requests for extensions. See id. at 647 & n.3. Thus, because we have no viable points of error to consider, the judgments are affirmed. See Tex. R. App. P. 81(b)(2), 90(a).

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Thomas,

Justice Cummings, and

Justice Vance

Affirmed

Opinion issued and filed February 1, 1995

Do not publish