Cecil Groves v. Thomas J. Blankenship--Appeal from 19th District Court of McLennan County
Annotate this CaseNO. 10-91-062-CV
IN THE
COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE
TENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT WACO
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
CECIL GROVES,
Appellant
v.
THOMAS J. BLANKENSHIP,
Appellee
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
From the 19th Judicial District Court
McLennan County, Texas
Trial Court # 90-2559-1
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
O P I N I O N
* * * * * * *
This appeal was perfected from a judgment signed on April l, 1991.
By motion Appellant requests that this appeal be dismissed. Appellee has not opposed the dismissal. The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed.
By motion Appellee requests the Court to assess damages pursuant to Rule 84, Tex. R. App. P., alleging that the appeal was instituted for the purpose of delay and without sufficient cause.
No statement of facts has been filed and without same we are unable to determine these issues. See Mid-Continent Cas. Co. v. Whatley, 742 S.W.2d 475, 479 (Tex.App. Dallas 1987, no writ).
The motion for Rule 84 damages is denied.
PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Thomas,
Justice Cummings and
Justice Vance
Dismissed
Opinion delivered and filed September 18, 1991
Do not publish
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.