Jason Anthony Long v. The State of Texas Appeal from 251st District Court of Randall County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-17-00459-CR JASON ANTHONY LONG, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 251st District Court Randall County, Texas Trial Court No. 27,499-C, Honorable Ana Estevez, Presiding September 18, 2018 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PARKER, JJ. Appellant Jason Anthony Long appeals his conviction for aggravated robbery. The appellate record has been filed. Appellant’s brief was originally due on July 19, 2018, but we granted appellant two extensions to file a brief. By letter of August 17, 2018, we admonished appellant’s counsel that (1) no further extensions would be granted and (2) that failure to file a brief by September 7 would result in the appeal being abated and the cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). To date, appellant’s counsel has neither filed a brief nor had any further communication with this court. Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 251st District Court of Randall County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall determine the following: 1. whether appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal; 2. whether appellant is indigent; 3. whether appellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel due to counsel’s failure to timely file an appellate brief, see Ex parte Briggs, 187 S.W.3d 458, 467 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that “a reasonably competent attorney—regardless of whether he is retained or appointed— must seek to advance his client’s best defense in a reasonably competent manner”); 4. whether new counsel should be appointed; and 5. if appellant desires to continue the appeal, the final date on which appellant will file appellant’s brief. The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessary to address the aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this court by October 8, 2018. If it is determined that appellant desires to proceed with the appeal, is indigent, and has been denied the effective assistance of counsel, the trial court may appoint him new counsel; the name, address, email address, and phone number of any new counsel appointed shall be included in the aforementioned findings. Should further time be needed to perform these tasks, then same must be requested before October 8, 2018. It is so ordered. Per Curiam Do not publish. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.