In re Antwain Jamar Tutson, Relator Appeal from ... of ... County (concurring memorandum opinion)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-17-00405-CV IN RE ANTWAIN JAMAR TUTSON, RELATOR Original Proceeding November 7, 2017 CONCURRING OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. I concur in the Court’s judgment and join in its opinion because I read the opinion to construe relator Tutson’s pending motions in the trial court to be the equivalent of a pending habeas corpus application under Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (West 2017). In that circumstance, I agree with the majority that we lack jurisdiction over his petition for mandamus. See Padieu v. Court of Appeals of Tex., Fifth Dist., 392 S.W.3d 115, 117 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013); In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 717 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding). James T. Campbell Justice

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.