SAR 1 Semi-Automatic Assault Rifle with Magazine, et al. v. The State of Texas Appeal from 137th District Court of Lubbock County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo ________________________ No. 07-17-00059-CV ________________________ SAR 1 SEMI-AUTOMATIC ASSAULT RIFLE WITH MAGAZINE, ET AL., APPELLANTS V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 137th District Court Lubbock County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016-522,855; Honorable Les Hatch, Presiding March 7, 2017 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. Appellant, Joe Dray Rushing, gave notice of appeal from the Default Judgment signed by the trial court on November 14, 2016. By letter dated February 14, 2017, the clerk of this court advised Rushing that a filing fee of $205 was overdue and that unless he was excused from paying costs under appellate rule 20.1, failure to pay the filing fee by February 24th would subject the appeal to dismissal without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1, 42.3(c). Rushing has not responded to the clerk’s letter, paid the filing fee, made other arrangements, or sought to proceed without payment of costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 12.1(b), 20.1. Unless a party is excused from paying a filing fee, the clerk of this court is required to collect filing fees set by statute or by the Texas Supreme Court when an item is presented for filing. See id. at 5, 12.1(b). Although the filing of a proper notice of appeal invokes an appellate court’s jurisdiction, if a party fails to follow the prescribed rules of appellate procedure, the appeal may be dismissed. Id. at 25.1(b). Accordingly, having provided Rushing a reasonable opportunity to cure this defect, this appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules and failure to comply with a notice from the clerk requiring action within a specified time. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). Per Curiam 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.