Richardo Cantu Resendez v. The State of Texas Appeal from 320th District Court of Potter County (memorandum opinion )
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-14-00378-CR RICARDO CANTU RESENDEZ, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 320th District Court Potter County, Texas Trial Court No. 68807-D, Honorable Don R. Emerson, Presiding December 4, 2014 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. Appearing pro se, appellant Ricardo Cantu Resendez attempts to appeal his conviction and sentence of six years’ confinement in prison for fraudulent use or possession of identifying information.1 Sentence was imposed on July 28, 2014, and appellant filed a notice of appeal on October 17, 2014. Appellant did not file a motion for new trial. 1 TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 32.51(c)(2) (West Supp. 2014). By letter, we notified appellant his notice of appeal appeared untimely thus depriving us of appellate jurisdiction. We afforded him an opportunity to file documents or matters he considered necessary for determination of our jurisdiction. Appellant made no response. Our appellate jurisdiction is triggered through a timely notice of appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Appellate rule 26.2(a) requires a notice of appeal in a criminal case be filed within 30 days after the day sentence is imposed in open court or within 90 days after imposition of the sentence if a timely motion for new trial is filed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1), (2). Because appellant did not file a motion for new trial, his notice of appeal was due within thirty days after the date sentence was imposed in open court. Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed more than eighty days after imposition of sentence and was therefore untimely. Our appellate jurisdiction has not been invoked. Consequently, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.2 James T. Campbell Justice Do not publish. 2 We do not reach the second issue called to appellant’s attention by our letter. The trial court’s certification of appellant’s right to appeal states this “is a plea-bargain case and the defendant has no right of appeal.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2),(d). 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
