Rodger Wayne Mitchell v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 64th District Court of Castro County

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 07-06-0056-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL B OCTOBER 16, 2006 ______________________________ RODGER WAYNE MITCHELL, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee _________________________________ FROM THE 64TH DISTRICT COURT OF CASTRO COUNTY; NO. A3024-0506; HON. ROBERT W. KINKAID, JR., PRESIDING _______________________________ Memorandum Opinion _______________________________ Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. Rodger Wayne Mitchell (appellant) appeals his conviction for burglary of a habitation. He was convicted by a jury and sentenced to twenty years confinement and a fine of $10,000. Appellant s appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw, together with an Anders1 brief, in which he certified that, after diligently searching the record, the appeal was without merit. Appellant filed a response on August 4, 2006. In compliance with the principles enunciated in Anders, appellate counsel reviewed the various stages of the trial and discussed several potential areas for appeal. However, he adequately explained why each argument lacks merit. We have also conducted our own review of the record and appellant s response to assess the accuracy of appellate counsel s conclusions and to uncover any error pursuant to Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.3d 503 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). Our own review has failed to reveal any reversible error. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is granted, and the judgment is affirmed. Brian Quinn Chief Justice Do not publish. 1 Anders v. California, 386 U .S. 738, 744-45, 87 S.C t. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (19 67). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.