Kevin Patrick Dunne v. Yunmei Chen Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 of Denton County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-22-00028-CV ___________________________ KEVIN PATRICK DUNNE, Appellant V. YUNMEI CHEN, Appellee On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. CV-2021-04341-JP Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION On January 18, 2022, appellant Kevin Dunne filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s January 10, 2022 judgment awarding possession of leased premises in Little Elm, Texas. Three times we have notified appellant that his notice of appeal is defective. In our last letter, dated March 30, 2022, we told appellant, On January 24 and March 2, 2022, the court notified you that your notice of appeal is defective, identified the defects, and directed you to file an amended notice of appeal. We have received no response. Accordingly, you are once more directed to file an amended notice of appeal that complies with Rule 25.1(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure in this court on or before Friday, April 11, 2022. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(d), (g). If you do not file an amended notice of appeal on or [before] Friday, April 11, 2022[,] your appeal will be dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f), 44.3. Appellant has failed to respond to all correspondence from this court. Additionally, the trial court’s online docket shows that a writ of possession for the premises issued on January 21, 2022, and that it was executed on January 31, 2022. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f); Wilson v. Bluffs at Paradise Creek, No. 02-14-00196-CV, 2015 WL 9598921, at *1 (Tex. App.––Fort Worth Dec. 31, 2015, pet. dism’d w.o.j.) (per curiam) (mem. op.) (dismissing appeal as moot when appellee had recovered premises according to writ of possession and appellant had not challenged judgment’s award of back rent and attorney’s fees in the appeal). Per Curiam Delivered: May 5, 2022 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
