Arthur Lee Jackson and Pamela Denise Jackson v. Sherali Ramzanali Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 of Tarrant County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-21-00237-CV ___________________________ ARTHUR LEE JACKSON AND PAMELA DENISE JACKSON, Appellants V. SHERALI RAMZANALI, Appellee On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021-002498-1 Before Bassel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellants Arthur Lee Jackson and Pamela Denise Jackson attempt to appeal from a “Rule 11 Agreement and Release.” We sent Appellants a letter on August 10, 2021, noting our concern that we may not have jurisdiction over this appeal because the trial court clerk had informed this court that the trial judge had not signed an order in this case and because it appears there is no final judgment or order subject to appeal. In the letter, we informed Appellants that they had until August 30, 2021, to furnish this court with a signed copy of the order they seek to appeal. We also advised Appellants that if no order had been signed and furnished to this court by August 30, 2021, this appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f). Appellants did not file a response, but Appellee Sherali Ramzanali filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Because we have no jurisdiction to address Appellants’ appeal, we therefore grant the motion to dismiss, and we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1 (providing for filing of notice of appeal from date that judgment or order is “signed”), 43.2(f), 44.3; see also Sammour v. Fed. Gov’t, No. 02-20-00268-CV, 2020 WL 6601596, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Nov. 12, 2020, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op.) (“There is no signed order or judgment in this case. We therefore dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.”). Per Curiam Delivered: October 7, 2021 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
