Kobi Electric, LLC; Kobi International, Inc.; and Fouad Saade a/k/a Frank Saade v. UMB Bank, N.A. Appeal from 17th District Court of Tarrant County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-21-00037-CV ___________________________ KOBI ELECTRIC, LLC; KOBI INTERNATIONAL, INC.; AND FOUAD SAADE A/K/A FRANK SAADE, Appellants V. UMB BANK, N.A., Appellee AND UMB BANK, N.A., Appellant V. MICHAEL SAWILOWSKY, Appellee On Appeal from the 17th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 017-299994-18 Before Walker, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Kerr, J. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion and Order MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER We have considered the “Joint Motion of UMB Bank, N.A., and Michael Sawilowsky to Vacate and Render Judgment Pursuant to Settlement.” Because it will not prejudice the remaining parties, we grant the motion in part and dismiss UMB Bank’s notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(b). The appeal filed by Kobi Electric, LLC; Kobi International, Inc.; and Fouad Saade remains pending. The style of this case shall now be Kobi Electric, LLC; Kobi International, Inc.; and Fouad Saade a/k/a Frank Saade v. UMB Bank, N.A.1 UMB Bank and Sawilowsky’s requests to vacate the trial court’s judgment regarding the claims between them, to enter judgment dismissing those claims with prejudice pursuant to their settlement agreement, and to assess costs equally between them will be carried with the case. See, e.g., Dawson v. Lipham, No. 02-15-00136-CV, 2016 WL 438394, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Feb. 4, 2016) (per curiam) (mem. op.), disp. on merits, 2016 WL 3569248 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth June 30, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op.). Per Curiam Delivered: October 28, 2021 We will not consider UMB Bank’s July 22, 2021 appellant’s brief in our disposition of the remainder of this appeal. UMB Bank’s appellee’s brief remains due no later than November 5, 2021. 2 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.