Craig Aslinger v. Amino Transport, Inc. Appeal from 96th District Court of Tarrant County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-20-00196-CV ___________________________ CRAIG ASLINGER, Appellant V. AMINO TRANSPORT, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 96th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 096-309811-19 Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT On October 15, 2020 and November 3, 2020, we notified appellant that the trial-court clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal has informed us that appellant has not arranged to pay for the clerk’s record as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2). In our notice, we warned that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant arranged to pay for the clerk’s record and provided us with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c), 37.3(b), 44.3. Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record, we now dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), 43.2(f). Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4. Per Curiam Delivered: December 3, 2020 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
