Patrick Jerome Moore, Jr. v. The State of Texas Appeal from 371st District Court of Tarrant County (opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-17-00216-CR PATRICK JEROME MOORE JR. APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ---------FROM THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 1464926D ---------- MEMORANDUM OPINION1 ---------On November 8, 2017, we abated this appeal. In our abatement order, we stated that we had reviewed the record and that we were concerned about whether the appeal required dismissal because appellant Patrick Jerome Moore Jr. had entered into a plea bargain. We explained that Moore’s plea of guilty to sexual assault in exchange for the waiver of two counts of indecency with a child 1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. by contact qualified as a plea bargain subject to rule of appellate procedure 25.2(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2) (restricting the right to appeal pleabargained convictions); Shankle v. State, 119 S.W.3d 808, 813–14 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003); see also Kennedy v. State, 297 S.W.3d 338, 342 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009). We instructed the trial court to amend its certification of Moore’s right to appeal and to indicate on the amended certification whether the trial court had granted him permission to appeal or whether he had no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d), (f). On November 16, 2017, the trial court signed an amended certification stating that this is a plea bargain case and that Moore has “NO right of appeal.” An appeal “must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). Under rule of appellate procedure 25.2, we must “dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.” Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Because the trial court has certified that Moore has no right of appeal, we dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d), 43.2(f); Chavez, 183 S.W.3d at 680; Serrell v. State, No. 02-16-00219-CR, 2016 WL 6648757, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Nov. 10, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication). 2 /s/ Wade Birdwell WADE BIRDWELL JUSTICE PANEL: KERR, PITTMAN, and BIRDWELL, JJ. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) DELIVERED: December 28, 2017 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
