Muqtasid Abdul Qadir v. The State of Texas Appeal from 213th District Court of Tarrant County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-16-00402-CR MUQTASID ABDUL QADIR APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ---------FROM THE 213TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 0591998D ---------- MEMORANDUM OPINION1 ---------Appellant Muqtasid Abdul Qadir attempts to appeal from a yet-to-be-made ruling on what he calls his “Compulsory Counterclaim in the form of Writ in Replevin, Plaint in Replevin, Declaration in Replevin, Bond in Replevin, and Affidavit in Support.” On October 27, 2016, this court sent Qadir a letter informing him of our concern that we lacked jurisdiction over the appeal because 1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. the trial court had not entered any appealable orders and because we generally have jurisdiction to consider an appeal in a criminal case only from a judgment of conviction. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1); McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1996, no pet.). We informed Qadir that unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal by November 7, 2016, we would dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Qadir filed a response, but it does not show grounds for continuing the appeal. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f). PER CURIAM PANEL: WALKER, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) DELIVERED: November 23, 2016 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
