Anthony G. Curtale v. The State of Texas Appeal from County Criminal Court No. 1 of Denton County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-16-00256-CR ANTHONY G. CURTALE APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ---------FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 1 OF DENTON COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. CR-2015-06729-A ---------- MEMORANDUM OPINION1 ---------Appellant Anthony G. Curtale attempts to appeal from his conviction for assault.2 On May 24, 2016, a jury convicted him of that offense, and the trial court assessed his punishment at 180 days’ confinement but suspended imposition of the sentence. The court placed appellant on community 1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. 2 See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.01(a) (West Supp. 2016). supervision for eighteen months and certified his right to appeal. Without filing a motion for new trial, appellant filed a notice of appeal on June 24, 2016. On July 28, 2016, we sent appellant a letter (through his counsel) expressing our concern that we lack jurisdiction because his notice of appeal was not timely filed. We asked him to file a response and informed him that if we determined that the appeal was not timely perfected, it would be dismissed. He has not responded to our letter. Because appellant did not file a motion for new trial following his May 24 conviction and suspension of his sentence, his notice of appeal was due on June 23, 2016. See Tex. R. App. P. 4.1(a), 26.2(a)(1); see also Ervin v. State, No. 0214-00251-CR, 2015 WL 5093201, at *3 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Aug. 27, 2015, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (calculating the deadline to file a notice of appeal under rule 4.1(a)). He filed the notice of appeal one day late on June 24, 2016. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). He did not file a motion for an extension of time to file the notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3(b). A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke our jurisdiction. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(b); Taylor v. State, 424 S.W.3d 39, 43 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Because appellant’s notice of appeal was one day late and because he did not file a motion to extend the time for filing the notice of appeal, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(b), 26.2(a), 43.2(f); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (“When a notice of appeal is filed within the fifteen-day period [for filing a motion for extension of 2 time] but no timely motion for extension of time is filed, the appellate court lacks jurisdiction.”); Brock v. State, No. 02-14-00310-CR, 2014 WL 5492730, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Oct. 30, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (applying Olivo and dismissing an appeal when the notice of appeal was one day late). PER CURIAM PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) DELIVERED: October 6, 2016 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
