Petrie Marquette Robinson v. The State of Texas Appeal from 158th District Court of Denton County (memorandum opinion )
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-16-00235-CR NO. 02-16-00236-CR NO. 02-16-00237-CR NO. 02-16-00238-CR PETRIE MARQUETTE ROBINSON APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ---------FROM THE 158TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY TRIAL COURT NOS. F-2008-0469-B, F-2008-0468-B, F-2008-0467-B, F-2008-0466-B ---------- MEMORANDUM OPINION1 ---------On August 20, 2015, Appellant Petrie Marquette Robinson filed a “Motion for Court to Provide Informa Pauperis for Transcripts and All Documents in the Said Cause Numbers Shown.” Through that motion, Robinson sought to obtain a 1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. copy of the trial record in cause numbers F-2008-0466-B, F-2008-0467-B, F2008-0468-B, and F-2008-0469-B, so that he could prepare an application for writ of habeas corpus. The trial court signed an order granting Robinson’s motion on September 14, 2015. Although the trial court granted Robinson’s motion, he filed a notice of appeal in each of his cases on October 5, 2015, challenging the trial court’s order that granted his motion because “in retrospect” he seeks additional documents not contained in the trial record. On June 22, 2016, we sent a letter to Robinson to inform him that we received his notices of appeal and that we were concerned that we lacked jurisdiction over his appeals because it appeared that no constitutional provision, statute, or rule authorizes his appeals. See Abbott v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 697 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (“[W]e have not found any rule or any statutory or constitutional provision that would authorize appellant’s appeal . . . . The court of appeals, therefore, lacked jurisdiction to decide the merits of appellant’s appeal.”). We informed Robinson that we would dismiss his appeals for want of jurisdiction unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeals filed a response showing grounds for continuing them on or before July 5, 2016. Although Robinson filed a response, it does not raise grounds for continuing these appeals. 2 Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f). /s/ Sue Walker SUE WALKER JUSTICE PANEL: WALKER, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) DELIVERED: August 4, 2016 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
