In Re Bayer Crop Science L.P., Monsanto Company, and BASF Corporation Appeal from 60th District Court of Jefferson County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-22-00232-CV __________________ IN RE BAYER CROP SCIENCE L.P., MONSANTO COMPANY, AND BASF CORPORATION __________________________________________________________________ Original Proceeding 60th District Court of Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. B-207,748 __________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Bayer Crop Science L.P., Monsanto Company, and BASF Corporation, Relators, filed a mandamus petition to enforce a mandatory venue provision in a lawsuit brought by the Real Parties in Interest, fifty-seven vineyard owners and four grape processors who allege that separate dicamba-based herbicides designed, developed, and manufactured by Monsanto and BASF for use on cotton and soybean crops migrated from the cotton fields where they were applied and damaged their 1 vineyards.1 See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 15.0642. Relators also challenged the trial court’s order denying their motion to transfer venue in an 1The plaintiffs named in the Plaintiffs’ Original Petition include: Andy Timmons, Inc. d/b/a Lost Draw Vineyards, Alegria de la Vida Vineyards, LLC, Alta Loma Vineyard Partnership, Benjamin Friesen, Bingham Family Vineyards, LLC, Rowdy Bolen and Tameisha Bolen, Bueno Suerte Vineyards, LLC, Castano Prado Vineyard, LLC, Mike West d/b/a Challis Vineyards, Chase Lane and Kendra Lane d/b/a Chase Lane Vineyard, Gary Steven Brown and Pamela Joyce Brown d/b/a Cooper Vineyard, Russell Smothermon and Sharlann Smothermon d/b/a Corkscrew Vineyard, Cornelious Corporation, Cox Family Winegrowers, LLC d/b/a Cox Family Vineyards, LT Investment Group, LLC d/b/a Crazy Cluster Vineyard, Mary Mckee d/b/a Curvo Fila Vineyard, Daniels Farmland Trust, Ty Wilmeth d/b/a Diamante Doble Dos Vineyards, Jeter and Gay Wilmeth d/b/a Diamante Doble Vineyard, Larry Smith and Sue Smith d/b/a Dog Gone Vineyard, Donna Burgess Enterprises, LLC d/b/a My Covenant, Dwayne Canada, Brenda Canada, and Daniel Canada d/b/a Canada Family Vineyard, Sawyer Farm Partnership d/b/a The Family Vineyard, Lonnie Graham and Penny Graham d/b/a Five Star Vineyard, Dustin Gilliam and Glenda Gilliam d/b/a Gilliam Gap Vineyards, Gillmore Brothers, LP d/b/a Gillmore Brothers Vineyard, Andis Applewhite d/b/a Half Circle Cross Vineyard, La Pradera Vineyards, LLC, Lahey Farms, LLC, Lilli of the Vine Vineyards, Inc., AA Martin Partners, Ltd., Peggy Seeley and George Seeley d/b/a Moonlight Vineyards, Narra Vineyards, LLC, Hilltop Winery at Paka Vineyards, LLC, Peggy Bingham d/b/a Peggy Bingham Farms, Tony Phillips and Madonna Phillips d/b/a Phillips Vineyard, Reddy Vineyards, Inc., Rowland Taylor Vineyards, LLC, Clara Ann McPherson d/b/a Sagmor Vineyards, Charles and Cheryl Seifert d/b/a Seifert Stables & Vineyards, Six Harts Vineyard, LLC, The Tom and Janice Henslee Living Trust, Doug Thomas and Anissa Thomas d/b/a Thomas Acres, Tony and Bertha Hendricks d/b/a Hendricks Family Vineyard, Carolyn Keane, Anna Winnell Young and Marjorie Jones Partnership d/b/a Tucker Farms, Twin-T Vineyards, Inc., Joe Riddle d/b/a Uva Morado Vineyard, Ronald Luker and Margaret Luker d/b/a White Rock Vineyards, Williams Ranch Vineyard, LLC, Larry Young d/b/a Young Family Vineyards, Caprock Distributors, LLC, Steve Newsom, Cindy Newsom and Gabe Hisel, Newsom Family Farms, LLC, Ledlie Powell, individually and as trustee of the Ledlie S. and Danette Powell Revocable Trust d/b/a Newsom Powell Vineyard, Don Hill d/b/a Don Hill Farms, Texas Custom Wine Works, LLC, Texas Winery Owners Group, LLC, Kim McPherson d/b/a McPherson Cellars, Inc., Lynce Charles Carroll, Texas Wine Company, Inc., and AKG Realty, Inc. 2 accelerated appeal from the trial court’s determination that the plaintiffs independently established proper venue. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 15.003(b). In the accelerated appeal, we reversed the trial court’s order denying the motion to transfer venue and remanded the case to the trial court with instructions to transfer the claims to the counties of proper mandatory venue. See Bayer Crop Science, L.P. v. Andy Timmons, Inc., No. 09-22-00204-CV, 2022 WL __________ (Tex. App.—Beaumont _____, 2022, no pet. h.) (mem. op.). Accordingly, we dismiss this original proceeding as moot. PETITION DISMISSED. PER CURIAM Submitted on August 15, 2022 Opinion Delivered November 17, 2022 Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ. 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.