In Re Commitment of John Graves Appeal from 435th District Court of Montgomery County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-17-00287-CV ____________________ IN RE COMMITMENT OF JOHN GRAVES ________________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 435th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 12-05-05201-CV ________________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION John Graves was civilly committed in 2012. See generally In re Commitment of Graves, No. 09-13-00141-CV, 2013 WL 6705980, at *1 (Tex. App.—Beaumont Dec. 19, 2013, pet. denied) (mem. op.). On June 15, 2017, the trial court signed a biennial review order that continued the previous order of civil commitment without modification. Graves filed a notice of appeal. We questioned our jurisdiction and asked the parties to file responses regarding whether the appeal was frivolous. The State filed responses but no response has been filed by Graves. 1 A biennial review order continuing a person’s civil commitment is not an appealable order. See In re Commitment of Richards, 395 S.W.3d 905, 908–10 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 2013, pet. denied). Graves has not identified an order that is appealable at this time. “To determine whether an appeal is objectively frivolous, we review the record from the viewpoint of the advocate and decide whether the advocate had reasonable grounds to believe the case could be reversed.” Glassman v. Goodfriend, 347 S.W.3d 772, 782 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2011, pet. denied). Graves has not presented any authority contrary to Richards nor has he presented any argument that Richards was wrongly decided and should be overruled. We conclude that the appeal is frivolous. See Tex. R. App. P. 45. In the event Graves files a frivolous appeal with this Court in the future, the Court will consider imposing sanctions. See id. The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a); 43.2(f). APPEAL DISMISSED. ________________________________ CHARLES KREGER Justice 2 Submitted on September 27, 2017 Opinion Delivered September 28, 2017 Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
