Frederick O. Silver v. Toyota Motor Manufacturing Texas, Inc., et al. Appeal from 131st Judicial District Court of Bexar County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-19-00409-CV Frederick O. SILVER, Appellant v. TOYOTA MOTOR MANUFACTURING TEXAS, INC. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Appellees From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019-CI-05365 Honorable Rosie Alvarado, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Beth Watkins, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice Delivered and Filed: November 27, 2019 DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION On October 16, 2019, we issued an opinion and judgment affirming the trial court’s June 5, 2019 Order on Ability to Pay Costs and ordered appellant Frederick O. Silver to pay the $205 filing fee for this appeal within 15 days. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207(b)(1), 51.941(a); see also id. §§ 51.208, 51.0051; TEXAS SUPREME COURT ORDER REGARDING FEES CHARGED IN THE SUPREME COURT, IN CIVIL CASES IN THE COURTS OF APPEALS, AND BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION (Misc. Docket No. 14-9158, Aug. 28, 2015). In our opinion 04-19-00409-CV affirming the trial court’s order, we cautioned appellant “that the failure to pay the filing fee will result in the dismissal of his appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. 5, 42.3. After we issued our October 16, 2019 opinion and judgment, appellant filed a “Response to Judgment and Order to Pay $205 Appeal Fee” and a “Response to Affirmed as to June 5, 2019 Order on Ability to Pay Costs.” We construed those documents as motions for rehearing of our October 16, 2019 opinion and judgment, and we denied both motions on October 18, 2019. In our October 18, 2019 order, we again cautioned appellant that the failure to pay the filing fee would result in the dismissal of his appeal. See TEX. R. APP. 5, 42.3. Appellant did not pay the filing fee within 15 days of our October 16, 2019 opinion and judgment. Instead, he filed two requests for the court’s Taxpayer Identification Number and Employer Identification Number “in Order to make payment to” the court. Because appellant did not require and was not entitled to that information in order to pay the filing fee for this appeal, we denied those requests on November 5, 2019. In our November 5, 2019 order, we ordered appellant to pay the filing fee within 5 days, and we again warned him that “failure to pay the filing fee in compliance with this order will result in the dismissal of this appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. 5, 42.3. Appellant did not pay the filing fee within 5 days of our November 5, 2019 order. Instead, on November 11, 2019, he filed a “Promissory Note of $205 for Appeal Fee.” This filing does not comply with our November 5, 2019 order, and appellant has not otherwise responded to that order. We therefore order this appeal dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. 5, 42.3. We further order that appellees Toyota Motor Manufacturing Texas, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. recover their costs of this appeal, if any, from appellant. PER CURIAM -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.