Logan Field v. The State of Texas Appeal from 216th Judicial District Court of Kerr County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-17-00321-CR, No. 04-17-00322-CR, No. 04-17-00323-CR, No. 04-17-00324-CR Logan Trey FIELD, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas Trial Court Nos. A16292, A16293, A16294, A16295 Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding Opinion by: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice Delivered and Filed: September 12, 2018 MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED, AFFIRMED Logan Trey Field appeals multiple convictions for possession of a controlled substance. In the trial court, Field pled guilty pursuant to plea bargain. The trial court convicted Field and imposed the sentences in accordance with Field’s plea agreement with the State. Field timely filed a notice of appeal. The trial court found Field was indigent and appointed him appellate counsel. Field’s appointed appellate counsel has filed in this court a motion to withdraw and a brief contending that there are no arguable issues and these appeals are frivolous and without merit. The brief demonstrates a professional and thorough evaluation of the records and meets the 04-17-00321-CR; 04-17-00322-CR; 04-17-00323-CR; 04-17-00324-CR requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978), and Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Counsel sent copies of the brief and motion to withdraw to Field and informed him of his rights in compliance with the requirements of Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313 (2014). Although Field was advised of his right to review the appellate records and file a pro se brief, he did not file a brief. We have thoroughly reviewed the records and counsel’s brief, and we conclude the records present no arguable grounds for appellate review and that the appeals are frivolous. We therefore grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgments of conviction. 1 Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice DO NOT PUBLISH 1 No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should Field wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, he must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days after either this court’s judgment is rendered or the last timely motion for rehearing or motion for en banc reconsideration is overruled by this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2(a). Any petition for discretionary review must be filed with the clerk of the Court of Criminal Appeals. See id. R. 68.3(a). Any petition for discretionary review must comply with the requirements of rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See id. R. 68.4. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
