Sidronio Sanchez, Blanca Edith Sanchez v. Ameripro Funding, Inc. d/b/a Ameripro Home Loans Appeal from County Court at Law No. 3 of Bexar County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-17-00228-CV Sidronio SANCHEZ, Blanca Edith Sanchez, Appellants v. AMERIPRO FUNDING, INC. d/b/a Ameripro Home Loans, Appellee From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017CV00951 Honorable Robert Behrens, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice Delivered and Filed: June 21, 2017 DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION Appellants Sidronio Sanchez and Blanca Edith Sanchez filed a notice of appeal in this court on April 11, 2017. Appellants were required to pay $205.00 and $10.00 in filing fees to this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5. 1 Appellants did not timely pay the required fees. Accordingly, when the fees remained unpaid, on May 25, 2017, this court ordered Appellants to provide written proof to 1 See also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207(b)(1) (filing fee $100.00) (West Supp. 2015); id. §§ 51.0051, .208 (additional fee $50.00); id. § 51.851(b) (electronic filing fee $20.00); id. § 51.941(a) (services for indigents fee $25.00); Texas Supreme Court Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07–9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B.l.(a). 04-17-00228-CV this court not later than June 6, 2017, that the filing fees have been paid or Appellants are entitled to appeal without paying the filing fees. See id. We warned Appellants that if they failed to respond as ordered, the appeal would be dismissed without further notice. See id. R. 5, 42.3; In re W.J.C., No. 04-05-00532-CV, 2005 WL 3477883, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Dec. 21, 2005, no pet.) (mem. op.). To date, Appellants have not paid the fees or filed any response with this court. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c). PER CURIAM -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.