Daniel Ortega v. The State of Texas Appeal from County Court at Law No. 11 of Bexar County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-15-00523-CR Daniel ORTEGA, Appellant v. The State The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the County Court at Law No. 11, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 436539 The Honorable Tommy Stolhandske, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice Delivered and Filed: September 30, 2015 DISMISSED On August 31, 2015, this court issued an order stating this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification that shows appellant has the right of appeal was made part of the appellate record within thirty days. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; see also Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174, 175-76 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order). Appellant did not file an amended certification or otherwise respond. The clerk’s record does not contain a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal. To the contrary, the trial court certification in the record states “this criminal case is a plea-bargain case, and the 04-15-00523-CR defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record shows the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. Therefore, the clerk’s record supports the trial court’s certification that defendant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). PER CURIAM DO NOT PUBLISH -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
