Jeffrey Wade Teasdale v. Jeanette Nichole MesserAppeal from 216th Judicial District Court of Kerr County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-13-00336-CV Jeffrey Wade TEASDALE, Appellant v. Jeanette Nichole Jeanette Nichole MESSER, Appellee From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas Trial Court No. 13133A Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Delivered and Filed: July 24, 2013 DISMISSED A filing fee of $175.00 was due from appellant Jeffrey Wade Teasdale when this appeal was filed but was not paid. 1 See TEX. GOV T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207(b)(1), 51.941(a)(1) (West 2005); Texas Supreme Court Order Regarding Fees Charged In Civil Cases In the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals (July 21, 1998) § B.1.(a). Rule 5 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides: 1 We also note the clerk s record has not yet been filed. On July 11, 2013, the trial court clerk informed this court that appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee and appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk s fee. The trial court clerk s Notification of Late Record is rendered moot by this dismissal. 04-13-00336-CV A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must pay at the time an item is presented for filing whatever fees are required by statute or Supreme Court order. The appellate court may enforce this rule by any order that is just. TEX. R. APP. P. 5. Accordingly, on June 21, 2013, this court ordered appellant to either (1) pay the applicable filing fee or (2) provide written proof to this court that he is excused by statute or the Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying the fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1 (providing that indigent party who complies with provisions of that rule may proceed without advance payment of costs). Our order informed appellant that if he failed to provide such written proof within the time ordered, this appeal would be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. Appellant has not responded. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. Costs of appeal are assessed against appellant. PER CURIAM -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
