John W. Glover v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 144th Judicial District Court of Bexar County

Annotate this Case
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-03-00310-CR
John W. GLOVER,
Appellant
v.
STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2002-CR-8312
Honorable Mark R. Luitjen, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Paul W. Green, Justice

Sarah B. Duncan, Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 30, 2003

DISMISSED

Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, John W. Glover pled guilty to aggravated robbery of an elderly person. On April 1, 2003, the trial court imposed sentence and signed a certificate stating that this "is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal." See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a). After Glover timely filed a general notice of appeal, the clerk sent copies of the certification and notice of appeal to this court. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(e). The clerk's record, which includes the trial court's Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification, has been filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).

"In a plea bargain case . . . a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after getting the trial court's permission to appeal." Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk's record, which contains a written plea bargain, establishes that the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk's record does not contain a written motion ruled on before trial nor does it indicate the trial court granted Glover permission to appeal. The trial court's certification therefore appears to accurately reflect that this is a plea bargain case and Glover does not have the right to appeal. This court must dismiss an appeal "if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made a part of the record." Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).

On May 13, 2003, we gave Glover notice that the appeal would be dismissed unless an amended certification showing he has the right to appeal has been made part of the record by June 13, 2003. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; Daniels v. State, No. 04-03-00176-CR, 2003 WL 21011277, at *2 (Tex. App.-San Antonio May 7, 2003, order). An amended

certification showing Glover has the right to appeal has not been filed. We therefore dismiss this appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.