Kenneth Edward Dixon v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 226th Judicial District Court of Bexar County
Annotate this CaseKenneth Edward DIXON,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court Nos. 89-CR-0957 & 90-CR-1648A
Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding
Opinion by: Tom Rickhoff, Justice
Sitting: Phil Hardberger, Chief Justice
Tom Rickhoff, Justice
Catherine Stone, Justice
Delivered and Filed: December 30, 1998
AFFIRMED
Kenneth Edward Dixon was convicted of possession of cocaine. He appeals from orders revoking his community supervision and sentencing him to five years in prison. Dixon's court-appointed attorney has filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. Counsel concludes that the appeals are frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744-45 (1967). Counsel has provided Dixon with a copy of the brief and advised him of his right to review the record and file a pro se brief. Dixon has not done so.
After reviewing the record, we agree that the appeals are frivolous and without merit. The judgments of the trial court are affirmed, and counsel's motion to withdraw is granted.
Tom Rickhoff, Justice
DO NOT PUBLISH
Return to4th Court of Appeals Opinions
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.