In re Konecranes, Inc. Appeal from 61st District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed December 1, 2017. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00833-CV IN RE KONECRANES, INC., Relator ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 61st District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2015-27771 MEMORANDUM OPINION On October 23, 2017, relator Konecranes, Inc. filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West Supp. 2017); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Fredericka Phillips, presiding judge of the 61st District Court of Harris County, to vacate the portions of her orders which sustained objections to and denied relator’s motion to compel documents responsive to Requests for Production 13, 14, 27, and 46, and information responsive to Interrogatories 2 and 19. To obtain mandamus relief, a relator generally must show both that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that the relator has no adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Relator has not established that it is entitled to mandamus relief. We therefore deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jamison, Busby, and Donovan. 2